Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Kincannon v. Schoenlaub
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 14, 1975No. 58847PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMAN, Judge.
This is an original proceeding in prohibition in which relator seeks to' restrain respondent judge from exercising jurisdiction in a divorce action. Upon application of relator, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District, issued a provisional rule in prohibition. After hearing, the provisional rule was made absolute. Application to transfer pursuant to Art. V, § 10, Mo.Const., V.A.M.S. was sustained and we decide the case here the same as an original proceeding filed in this court. In so doing, we utilize, without quotation marks, some portions of the opinion of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barber-Greene Company v. Blaw-Knox Company and All Purpose Spreader CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Product Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. v. Andrew F. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Continental Electric Company v. Ebco, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Martinez v. MartinezSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- State ex rel. Davis v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- West v. Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. J.E. Dunn, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. SchoenlaubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State Ex Rel. General Dynamics Corp. v. LutenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- STATE EX INF. RIEDERER v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bellon Wrecking & Salvage Co. v. David Orf, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.