Legal Opinion

Pairo v. Vickery

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 21, 1873PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The hill in this case was filed by the appellant to set aside a mortgage executed by her, of certain trust property, to the appellees’ intestate, her trustee. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court. The Court below dismissed the appellant’s bill on the ground of “the.death of Mr. Carson four years after the mortgage was executed, and the filing of the bill five years after its execution.”

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

The facts of this case as disclosed by the record, so far as it appears material to state them, are as follows:

On the 20th day of January, 1865, Samuel O. Edes made his last will; by the tenth clause of which ho devised “to Thomas J. Carson, his heirs and personal representatives, all his estate, effects and property real, *482personal and mixed, wheresoever situate, in trust and confidence, for the objects and purposes in this clause of his will declared concerning the same; that is to say: that during the natural life of his mother, his estate, and property of every kind, (excepting the money…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoffman Steam Coal Co. v. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  2. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  3. Smith v. TownshendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Warren v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Carson v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Whitridge v. WhitridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Hopper v. HopperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. Hughes v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API