Legal Opinion

King v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 22, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

Appellant, having been convicted of the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property, then and there knowing the said property had been stolen, perfected his appeal to this Court.

The appellant in his brief had posed eight questions for our consideration.

The First Question challenges the propriety of the action of the trial court in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance. It is sufficient to say that the motion as presented to the court below was entirely insufficient to require the court to grant the continuance. Therefore, no abuse of judicial discretion has been made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fitch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Fisk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Tidwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Hatcher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Hayward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Channell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Lampley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API