Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dunkum v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1979No. 78-290Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I cannot agree with the majority’s construction of the governing statute. In my opinion, there is no substantial evidence that a majority of the inhabitants had signed the petition for incorporation. Under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-106 (Repl. 1968), the circuit court was required to annul the incorporation if it appeared to its satisfaction that a majority of the inhabitants had not signed the petition. Town of Wrightsville v. Walton, 255 Ark. 523, 501 S.W. 2d 241.

The trial judge’s decision does not indicate its basis or his interpretation of the statute. I do not agree with the majority’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hodges v. DawdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ByarsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Town of Wrightsville v. WaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Arkansas Pollution Control Commission v. CoyneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API