Legal Opinion
Scarborough v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 2012No. SD 31159PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., Presiding Judge.
Tyrone L. Scarborough (“Scarborough”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
Scarborough was charged with one count of possession of a controlled substance, pursuant to section 195.202. The State’s information alleged that on or about September 19, 2001, Scarborough “possessed cocaine, a controlled substance, knowing of its presence and nature.”
At Scarborough’s plea hearing, he indicated he wished to enter an Alforá 2 plea. The plea…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Hurst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Geren v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- O'NEAL v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lynn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Kevin L. NashWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Kevin L. NashWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020