State v. Gary
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The search of the defendant’s handbag which yielded narcotics cannot be sustained under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), as the state argues, because the officers in question unjustifiably went into the purse without first conducting a prior external pat-down for weapons, which is required (and would have revealed that she was not carrying a firearm as the police supposedly feared). J.R.H. v. State, 428 So.2d 786 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Jamison v. State, 455 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Fraley v. State, 374 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979);…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Meeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Baldwin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Raleigh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- J.R.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- T.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Lencsak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991