Legal Opinion

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 15, 2003No. 3D02-1507PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant’s amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caduceus Properties, LLC v. William G. Graney, P.E.Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012