Legal Opinion

Davila v. Soto

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 1485PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Appellant, Ines Davila, seeks a reversal of the lower court’s decision denying, his petition to appeal in forma pauperis. Since we do not believe that it can be said that the lower court abused its discretion, we affirm.

This case arose out of an automobile accident between appellant and appellee, Jose Soto. Appellant brought a suit in trespass against appellee for damages to appellant’s automobile in the amount of $1,159.28. Appellee then counterclaimed in the amount of $535.45 for damages to his car. The case went to arbitration, and the arbitrators unanimously awarded $535.45…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grerlitzki v. FeldserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Schoepple v. SchoeppleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Mitek v. Ste-Mel Signs, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Koziatek v. MarquettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Thompson v. Garden Court, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Selby v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Griffin v. TedescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Banks v. RyanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API