Legal Opinion

Greater Louisville First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Etzler

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 26, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

The appellant appeals from a summary judgment granted appellees by the trial court in a foreclosure action brought by appellant due to appellees’ alleged violation of a due-on-sale clause in their mortgage.

In 1979, appellee J. Scott Etzler (“Etz-ler”) borrowed $44,500.00 from appellant (“Greater Louisville”) to purchase a house at 10502 Burns Court in Louisville. Etzler executed a promissory note and mortgage to Greater Louisville which included the following “due-on-sale” clause:

17. Transfer of the Property; Assumption. If all or any part of the Property or an interest therein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Sebastian v. FloydKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Leslie County v. MaggardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Smith v. Frontier Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Trinity Temple Charities, Inc. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darr v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Clover Creek Solar Project, LLC D/B/A New Frontiers Solar Park v. Breckinridge County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2026
  3. Cobb v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API