Legal Opinion
Willis v. Fitbit, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 27, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01377Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARON WILLIS, Case No.: 19-cv-01377-DMS (WVG) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY THE ACTION 14 FITBIT, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Fitbit, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration and 18 to dismiss or stay the action. Plaintiff Baron Willis filed an opposition to Defendant’s 19 motion, and Defendant filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants 20 Defendant’s motion and stays further proceedings pending arbitration. 21 I. 22…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.