Legal Opinion

Cook v. Broughton

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion" by plaintiff for an order overruling defendants’ answer as frivolous and for judgment on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

This is an action brought to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendant Darius Broughton to one Clossey to secure the payment of the sum of $931,73, the said mortgage having been given to secure part of the purchase price of a portion of the premises described therein, and it having been duly transferred to plaintiff before the commencement of this áction.

It appears from the complaint .that defendant Darius Broughton has paid part of the sum secured by said mortgage, to-wit: $300, leaving an unpaid balance of $631.73, with interest from April 1,1916.

The defendant Darius Broughton answers the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dahlstrom v. . GemunderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. City of New York v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Preston v. CuneoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cook v. BroughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API