Bradley v. Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
MARY BECK BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Mitchell Bradley appeals a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security deny ing his application for benefits. We affirm.
I.Background
Bradley applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, claiming a variety of impairments left him unable to work. An administrative law judge (ALJ) evaluated Bradley’s claim using the five-step disability determination process. See Wall v. Astrue, 561 F.3d 1048, 1052 (10th Cir.2009) (summarizing the five-step process). At the second step, the ALJ found Bradley had severe…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Keyes-Zachary v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Ray MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Mays v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Maes v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Casale v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
- Coterill v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Crandall v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
- Derryberry v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Dollar v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.