Legal Opinion

Lindsey Campbell v. Rob Kolkman, Constable Kolkman LLC

District Court, D. Utah

Decided April 30, 2026No. 2:23-cv-00914Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH LINDSEY CAMPBELL, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING [ECF NO. 59] Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING v. [ECF NO. 76] DEFENDANTS’ RULE 56(d) MOTION; AND DENYING [ECF ROB KOLKMAN, CONSTABLE NO. 88] DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR KOLKMAN LLC, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Case No. 2:23-cv-00914-DBB-DAO District Judge David Barlow Before the court is Plaintiff Lindsey Campbell’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,1 Defendants Rob Kolkman and Constable Kolkman LLC’s Rule 56(d) Motion,2 and Defendants’ Motion for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Northington v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API