Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 14, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

99 N.J. Super. 223 (1968)

239 A.2d 248

FRANK H. SCHWARTZ AND LOUISE SCHWARTZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 5, 1968.

Decided February 14, 1968.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

Mr. Edward J. Russo argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Nugent, Russo & Tumulty, attorneys).

Mr. Frederick Klaessig argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

2Per curiam

The facts of the case and the terms of the policy are set forth in Judge Botter's opinion reported in 96 N.J. Super. 520…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. G.S. v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Furr v. Metropolitan Life Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Chemtec Midwest Services, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  5. Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API