Kaltsas v. Kaltsas
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Paul Harry Kaltsas died in November, 1980, a domiciliary of Greece. His will provided that all his property, real and personal, was to pass “in usufruct” to his wife, the defendant Kaltsas, for her life, and the “naked ownership” was to pass in equal shares to his children, one of whom is the plaintiff. The terms usufruct and naked ownership seem to be analogous (on what the record discloses of Greek law) to life interest and remainder, respectively. See New England Trust Co. v. Wood, 326 Mass. 239, 244 (1950). The defendant Kaltsas, who lives in Athens, is acting as executrix of the will in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- O'BRIEN v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Lowe v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jensen v. DanielsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Brockelman v. Western Surety Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- Consedine v. ConsedineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995