Legal Opinion

People v. Katz

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1965No. Crim. 9350PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendants, licensed pharmacists, were accused by an indictment charging them with several violations of section 11715 of the Health and Safety Code (forgery of narcotic prescriptions), and section 11501 of the Health and Safety Code (illegal sale of narcotics). Their first trial resulted in their conviction. The judgments were reversed on appeal by reason of certain errors committed by the prosecution in the improper presentation of evidence as rebuttal which should have been presented as part of its case in chief and by certain erroneous instructions given by the trial court. (People v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. WallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API