Legal Opinion

United States v. Pickard

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided February 14, 1992No. IP 91-130-CR-01Published

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY

BARKER, District Judge.

William A. Pickard III has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against him on the basis that the government’s conduct was “outrageous;” Pickard claims that the government targeted him for investigation without a reasonable basis, manufactured a crime through repeated requests and coercion, and inflated the seriousness of the offense. Pickard’s motion has been fully briefed, and upon review of the parties’ filings and record, the motion to dismiss is DENIED.

I. Discussion

Outrageous Conduct

Pickard moves to dismiss the indictment claiming, “investigative conduct…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Randolph Thompson, Terrius Wynn, Alcus Todd Thompson, and Donovan DawesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API