Legal Opinion

Budnick v. Palmer Division of District Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 4, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, Thomas P. Budnick, filed a petition in the county court seeking an “investigation” as to why “seven hundred and eighty-eight (788) audio/video Show Cause applications” he filed in the Palmer Division of the District Court Department were denied without a hearing over a twenty-eight year period. A single justice considered the petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, and denied relief without a hearing. We affirm.

It was the petitioner’s burden to create a record establishing entitlement to relief, “not merely to allege but to demonstrate, i.e., to provide copies of the lower…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Victory Distributors, Inc. v. Ayer Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Scott v. Dedham Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Feinman v. New Bedford DivisionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API