Straus v. Hoadley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Joshua Piza, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Yew York on the 9th day of June, 1897, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Yew York Special Term overruling the said defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, J.:
This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment overruling the demurrer of the defendant Piza to the complaint. The action was upon a policy of marine insurance issued by agents of certain individual underwriters, doing business under the name of the “ South and Yorth American Lloyds.” By the terms of the policy relating to the liability of the underwriters it' is provided as follows: “ And the said firms, corporations and' individuals are contented and promise to bind themselves severally and not jointly, nor any one for any other, their respective executors and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Isear v. DaynesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fish v. . VanderlipNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Fish v. VanderlipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Sumner v. PizaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- American Lucol Co. v. BlanchardNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- American Lucol Co. v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.