Jones v. Turner
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order overruling appellant’s demurrer and granting respondents leave to amend their complaint. According to the Statement of the Case, which is binding on the parties, appellant’s counsel was not notified of the hearing on the motions nor was he present.
Because appellant did not have notice of the hearing, the order was improperly issued. See, e.g., Whittle v. Multiple Services, Inc., 283 S. C. 559, 324 S. E. (2d) 62 (1984); Herring v. Credit Bureau of Columbia, 272 S. C. 368, 252 S. E. (2d) 123 (1979); Brown v. Mickens, 256 S. C. 346, 182 S. E. (2d) 417 (1971).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whittle v. Multiple Services, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Herring v. Credit BureauSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Brown v. MickensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971