Legal Opinion

Bitowf v. Saul

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided March 29, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00845Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION STEVE C. BITOWF, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-00845-N ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Steve C. Bitowf brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (collectively, “DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq.1…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API