Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Read
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Hickman
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
In the trial court Richard Read, the employee, recovered judgment against Federal Underwriters Exchange, the insurer, for compensation under our Workmen’s Compensation Law, Article 8306 et seq., and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 142 S. W. (2d) 440.
By its first group of assignments, the insurer called into question the action of the trial court in permitting the employee to have the case reinstated on the docket of that court after he had voluntarily discontinued same in vacation and paid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wright v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Texas Indemnity Insurance v. ThibodeauxTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Southern Underwriters v. SamanieTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- The Southern Underw't'rs v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of San Benito v. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Frost National Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Wilborn v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.