Griswold v. State

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge

In this interlocutory appeal, Richard Griswold appeals from an order of the trial court denying his second motion to suppress the results of a chemical test of his blood, which was administered after he was involved in an automobile accident that resulted in a fatality.

The following restated issue is presented in this appeal:

Did the trial court err in determining that Ind.Code § 9-30-7-3 is constitutional and in denying Griswold’s second motion to suppress?

We affirm.

The facts most favorable to the trial court’s decision are as follows. At approximately 11 p.m. on…