Legal Opinion

Floyd Eugene Swartz, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1989No. 88-2757PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The dispositive issue in this case is whether certain gold and silver commodity futures contracts bought and sold by taxpayer Floyd E. Swartz, Jr. constituted capital assets under section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code. 1 The Tax Court 2 held that losses stemming from these contracts were capital losses, which could not be deducted from ordinary income to eliminate tax liability. We affirm.

From December 1980 to December 1983, Swartz worked full-time trading commodity futures contracts. He made his transactions through brokerage houses, and had no direct contacts with other buyers and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Arkansas Best Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. King v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  5. Van Suetendael v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Andrew Crispo Gallery, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Circle K Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. Stephen Marrin and Jane Marrin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Don D. Dial Elizabeth A. Dial v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API