Boatright v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Underwood, Judge.
Jack Boatright appeals his conviction of selling marijuana. We affirm.
1. In enumeration of error 1 Boatright contends that the court erred in allowing in evidence hearsay statements related by the law enforcement officers. However, the court admitted the statements for the limited purpose of explaining the officers’ conduct in going to certain locations, or "meets,” as a result of the conversations, and the jury was instructed accordingly. Consequently no reversible error appears. Code Ann. § 38-302; Harrell v. State, 241 Ga. 181 (243 SE2d 890) (1978).
A different result is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Favors v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Willingham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- McRoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Stamper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983