Legal Opinion

Goodman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 2003No. 1D02-339PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

839 So.2d 902 (2003)

Ronald GOODMAN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D02-339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2003.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Gary D. Wimsett, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Robert L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of a conviction, following a jury trial, for possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis. The state's case was based on constructive possession. Appellant denied knowledge that the cannabis was present.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Blunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Murray v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Byrd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API