In re A.R.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
Appellant, A.R. appeals the trial court’s September 6, 2006, order closing her neglect case, sua sponte, after she reached her eighteenth birthday. We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to base its order on a correct legal principle, the need to safeguard the child’s welfare, or the best interest of the child standard. Hence, we are constrained to reverse the trial court’s order, and we remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On June 1, 2006, the trial court decided, sua sponte, to close A.R.’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re S.L.E.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re T.R.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re D.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re J.E.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996