Legal Opinion · Dissent

Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 19, 1932No. 12,954Published

1DissentJustice Hilliard

The decision of the court sustaining the plea in bar brings, I presume, an end to the shameful history of the construction and leasing of the Moffat tunnel. Shameful, I say, because as the records and opinions of the courts that have been concerned indicate too plainly, never, either in the deliberations of the tunnel commission or in the courts, were the taxpayers of the district given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. Shameful, I say, because by legal gymnastics the actual issue, the question of the validity of the supplemental bonds, has been foreclosed and the taxpayers and their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API