Legal Opinion

Deitchman v. Woolsey

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 4, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

This case involves the construction of the following provisions of the will of John M. Seabolt:

“Second. After the payment of my just debts and funeral expenses, all the rest and residue of my estate, real, personal and mixed, of every kind whatsoever, I will to my beloved wife, Lizzie E. Seabolt, for and during her natural life, her interest being only a life estate therein.
“Third. In the event my said wife shall predecease me or at her death after me, I will that my estate shall be distributed as follows:
“A. That $1000.00 shall be paid to each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Atkinson v. KernCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. McGinnis v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Perkins v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pence v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API