Legal Opinion
Deitchman v. Woolsey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 4, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack
Affirming.
This case involves the construction of the following provisions of the will of John M. Seabolt:
“Second. After the payment of my just debts and funeral expenses, all the rest and residue of my estate, real, personal and mixed, of every kind whatsoever, I will to my beloved wife, Lizzie E. Seabolt, for and during her natural life, her interest being only a life estate therein.
“Third. In the event my said wife shall predecease me or at her death after me, I will that my estate shall be distributed as follows:
“A. That $1000.00 shall be paid to each of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Atkinson v. KernCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- McGinnis v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Perkins v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pence v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946