Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Price
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 13, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pierson R Hildreth, S.
This discovery proceeding is instituted by the executor of decedent’s will to determine the ownership of the proceeds of a sale of real property.
During their lifetimes decedent and his wife owned real property as tenants by the entirety. In 1962 they entered into a separation agreement. By this agreement, which is concededly *775valid, they mutually agreed upon a disposition of such real, property. They agreed that the wife pay certain expenses, have possession, and that the husband would sign any necessary documents in case the wife decided to sell the property. They also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In re CorriganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Secrist v. SecristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- In Re the Accounting of CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of GarofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Estate of RothwachsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
- In re the Estate of VioliNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
- In re the Estate of VioliNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Estate of VioliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984