Legal Opinion
Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Hackett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1929No. 18234PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY, C.
This action was commenced by the state of Oklahoma on relation of S. B. Hackett, county attorney of Push-mataha county, Okla., for the use and benefit of said county, as plaintiff, against W. H. Jackson and the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, as defendants, in the district court of Pushmataha county, for recovery on an alleged shortage in the accounts of said W. H. Jackson, who was county treasurer, and the Fidelity & Casualty Company, surety, on his official bond. The action was commenced on June 29, 1922, and the petition alleged that said Jackson was the duly elected,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hinton v. State Ex Rel. Neal, County AttorneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Swarts v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Joint School Dist. No. 105 v. First Nat. Bank of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sutherland v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Berger v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Independent School District 93, Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma v. Western Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Berger v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934