Legal Opinion
Val/Del, Inc. v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 2, 1985No. 2 CA-SA 133PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
This special action has been taken from the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s complaint. We have accepted jurisdiction because the petitioner’s remedy by appeal is not adequate and because the question presented is a matter of great significance to those who may desire to do business with the respondent tribe. See State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, 138 Ariz. 500, 675 P.2d 1319 (1984); University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court of the County of Maricopa, 136 Ariz. 579, 667 P.2d 1294 (1983).
On January 11, 1984,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- C & L Enterprises Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pan American Company v. Sycuan Band of Mission IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Oglala Sioux Tribe v. C & W ENTERPRISES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. Hopland Band of Pomo IndiansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- American Indian Agricultural Credit Consortium, Inc. v. Standing Rock Sioux TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.