Legal Opinion

Snell v. Frank Snell Sawmill Co.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided March 12, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Suit by Frank N. Snell and another against the Frank Snell Sawmill Company and another. On interventions by solicitors for an allowance of fees. Allowance to complainants’ solicitors denied, and allowance to defendants’ solicitors granted.

1Opinion of the Court

BEVERLY D. EVANS, District Judge.

A tripartite agreement was made between the Frank Snell Sawmill Company, a Florida corporation, party of the first part, the J. C. Turner Lumber Company, a New York corporation, party of the second part, and Frank N. Snell and Jay E. Rice, parties of the third part, in substance as follows :

The Turner Company was to purchase all the first mortgage bonds of the Snell Company for $170,000, the issued second mortgage bonds for $70,000 (the latter sum to be used in the payment of outstanding indebtedness, not to exceed $55,000, balance to be used for working…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snell v. J. C. Turner Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. J. C. Turner Lumber Co. v. ToomerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  3. Snell v. Frank Snell Sawmill Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API