Jones v. State

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant, Alfred D. Jones, appeals his conviction and judgment, claiming that the trial court erred in submitting the case to the jury, because the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the of*237fense for which he was convicted, sale of an imitation controlled substance, and because there was confusion regarding whether claimant was charged with sale of an imitation controlled substance or with sale of a substance in lieu of a controlled substance. We affirm the conviction, but reverse and remand the judgment for correction of a technical error in the…