Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lohman v. Lohman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1946No. L. A. 19299Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarter, J.

I concur in the judgment of reversal and in that portion of the opinion of Mr. Justice Edmonds which directs the entry of an order authorizing the presentation of a claim against the estate of the deceased for the installments of alimony accruing within five years prior to the application of appellant to enforce the judgment in her favor, but I dissent from that portion of the opinion which purports to approve the order of the trial court denying leave to appellant to enforce the payments provided for in the decree which accrued prior to that time.

Mr. Justice Edmonds predicates the portion of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bank of Jonesboro v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Hatch v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Miles v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Shields v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API