Legal Opinion · Dissent
Kaufman v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 1984Published
1DissentSandler, J.
In an action to recover damages for adenocarcinoma of the cervix and vagina alleged to have resulted from the ingestion by plaintiff’s mother of Diethylstilbestrol (DES) while pregnant with plaintiff, the defendant Eli Lilly & Company (Lilly), appeals from an order entered December 3,1982, which: (1) granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the basis of issue preclusion as to certain issues determined by the special verdicts and judgment in Bichler v Lilly & Co. (79 AD2d 317, affd 55 NY2d 571); (2) granted plaintiff’s motion and that of codefendants for a severance of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.