Burton v. Sanders
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Judge.
The appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the appellants are proceeding under Rule 3.2, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., governing final appeals, rather than Rule 4.2, governing interlocutory appeals.
A final decree of foreclosure was rendered in the above entitled cause on March 19, 1964. Subsequently, in September of 1964, motion was made for a deficiency judgment, which was denied. It was from the order denying a deficiency decree that appellants appeal.
The appellees, in their briefs submitted with their motion to dismiss, cite the case of Finneran…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Thomas v. Cilbe, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Theo. Hirsch Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Crepaldi v. WagnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Shannon v. ShannonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Small v. SmallSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Watson v. City of HallandaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Triax, Inc. v. City of Treasure IslandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Ringsmith v. SquibbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966