Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gertken v. Farmers Elevator of Kensington, Minnesota, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1987No. C9-86-2147Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPopovich, Chief Judge

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part because:

1. I agree with Judge Leslie that Minn. Stat. § 169.09, subd. 3 (1986) creates a duty to provide reasonable assistance, a violation of which is prima facie evidence of negligence. Minn.Stat. § 169.96 (1986). The trial court erred in excluding evidence of post-collision negligence. The plaintiffs complaint was broadly pleaded and needed no additional specificity. Even if it did, the trial court erred in prohibiting amendment of the complaint.

2. I disagree with the majority finding that as a matter of law Lintel’s inaction was not the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Siegler v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API