Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1925No. 7967Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant insists that we should have considered his bill of exceptions No. 14. A re-examination of the question, in view of the authorities to which we have been referred in argument on .the motion, has convinced us that we were in error regarding this matter. The bill recites that an effort had been made by the State to show that the improper relation between deceased and appellant’s wife was the result o.f her advancements rather than deceased’s; that two weeks before the homicide the wife was in the hospital sick, and that appellant found deceased…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Pinkerton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Bereal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API