Legal Opinion

New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

This is a water rate case. Two major questions require decision.

First: Did the Supreme Court, as it is claimed, erroneously exercise its supervisory power and fail fully to discharge its duty in affirming an order of our Board of Public Utility Commissioners under date of October 4th, 1937, fixing a rate of $99 per million gallons of water?

Second: Is the rate so fixed and determined, as it is claimed to be, unjust, unreasonable and confiscatory?

Appellant, Hew Jersey Suburban Water Company, hereafter referred to as prosecutor (now insolvent…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. New Jersey Power Light Co. v. Borough of ButlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. In Re NJ Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. In Re Hawaiian Telephone CompanyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re Hawaiian Telephone CompanyHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API