Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 9, 1990No. 89-218PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson. J.

Before trial on a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, RSA 159:3 (Supp. 1988), defendant filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the adoption of part I, article 2-a of the New Hampshire Constitution conferred the right to bear arms on all citizens, and therefore rendered RSA 159:3 (Supp. 1988) unconstitutional. The Superior Court (Mohl, J.) denied his motion, and defendant was convicted on stipulated facts by the Court (Gray, J.). The defendant now appeals, claiming that his conviction violated his constitutional right to bear arms and his right of due process, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riblet Tramway Co. v. StickneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. State v. ComleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. People v. SwintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State of Missouri v. Santonio L. McCoySupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Bleiler v. Chief, Dover Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. State of Missouri v. Marcus MerrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API