Legal Opinion

United States v. Weikert

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 9, 2007No. 19-2279PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

This case presents a question of first impression in this circuit: is it a violation *3of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures to require an individual on supervised release to provide a blood sample for purposes of creating a DNA profile and entering it into a centralized database? Agreeing with the eleven other circuits that have held similarly, we hold that it is not. In doing so, we interpret the Supreme Court’s decision in Samson v. California, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2193, 165 L.Ed.2d 250 (2006), to require that we join the majority of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Boston Duck Tours, LP v. Super Duck Tours, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Kaemmerling v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. Sindicato Puertorriqueño de Trabajadores, Seiu Local 1996 v. FortuñoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Peoples Federal Savings Bank v. People's United BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API