Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Bivins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1932No. 21360Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

This is the third appearance of this case in this court. See Bivins v. Tucker, 41 Ga. App. 771 (154 S. E. 820), 42 Ga. App. 254 (155 S. E. 532). Upon the principles there ruled, and previously ruled in Tallent v. Crim, 19 Ga. App. 16 (90 S. E. 742), the petition as finally amended was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Dowling & Dowling, for plaintiff. P. Q. Bryan, Marlin L-. Bivins, for defendant.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bivins v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Tallent v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Arnold v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Bivins v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930