Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1987No. 86-3016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Where, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, there remains a material issue of fact which cannot be settled due to a question as to the competency and authority of the movant’s affiant, see Montejo Investments, N.V. v. Green Co., 471 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and the supporting affidavits did not disprove the affirmative defenses or establish the legal insufficiency of these defenses, O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), it was error to enter summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. MONTEJO INV. v. Green Companies, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newton v. Overseas Private Investment Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988