Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. D.D. No. 84-20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CottonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015