Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1984No. D.D. No. 84-20PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objections to the board’s recommendations, we agree that the appropriate sanction for respondent is a one-year suspension.
Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CottonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015