Legal Opinion
United Pacific Insurance v. Edgecomb
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 9, 1985No. 12782-9-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorbett, C.J.
Jonny Lee Edgecomb appeals the declaratory judgment limiting his recovery under an insurance policy issued by United Pacific Insurance Company (United Pacific). We affirm.
In September 1978 a car driven by Richard Pursell collided with Edgecomb's pickup truck. With Edgecomb in the truck was his 5-year-old son, Matthew, who suffered permanent neurological injury. Edgecomb suffered a concussion, multiple lacerations and contusions, as well as injuries to his ankle and neck. Pursell was insured by United Pacific with coverage limits of $100,000 for bodily injury to each person and $300,000 for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- United Services Automobile Assn. v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Employers Casualty Insurance v. FoustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- West American Insurance v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ScherrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Wolfe v. State Farm Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i v. LawrenceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Pekin Insurance Co. v. HughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Daley v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.