Legal Opinion

State v. California Packing Corporation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1943No. 6584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Was the demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint properly sustained? That is the only question presented by this appeal from the District Court of Weber County. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for the loss of certain trout alleged to have been killed by the act of the defendant in polluting certain waters. The original complaint was in two causes of action: One founded upon the alleged violation of a specific duty, allegedly imposed upon defendant by statute; the other upon the theory of negligent conduct on the part of defendant. The District Court sustained a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Irwin v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Mississippi Mills Co. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieArizona Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. California Packing CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ohio Water Service Co. v. ResslerOhio Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. California Packing CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API