Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Butner

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 14, 1983No. 41874; ACM S25054Published

1DissentFletcher, Judge

The Air Force Court of Military Review issued a pro forma opinion in this case affirming appellant’s conviction. In view of the sheer number of police investigatory improprieties in this case and the impact such practices, might have on the military justice system, I find its reticence surprising.

The question I will address is the admissibility of Cady’s testimony at appellant’s court-martial. In Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 94 S.Ct. 2357, 41 L.Ed.2d 182 (1974), the Supreme Court upheld the admissibility of testimony of a witness discovered by the police as a result of a statement made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. LeifferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API