Legal Opinion
In re Marriage of Tantiwongse
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 16, 2007No. 3-05-0287 RelPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE LYTTON
delivered the opinion of the court:
The Law Offices of Edward R. Jaquays law firm (Jaquays) sought attorney fees from its former client, Martha Tantiwongse. The trial court accepted a stipulation requiring Martha to pay Jaquays $5,100 for the work it performed on Martha’s behalf. The trial court also ordered Martha to pay Jaquays $2,353 for attorney fees Jaquays incurred collecting the fees Martha owed. Martha appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) accepting the stipulation, and (2) ordering her to pay Jaquays attorney fees for collecting from her. We affirm…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Hamer v. LentzIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Bloome v. Wiseman, Shaikewitz, Mc-Givern, Wahl, Flavin & Hesi, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Cheney v. RicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Estate of MossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Schad, Diamond and Shedden, P.C. v. My Pillow, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
- Dolan v. O'CallaghanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- McCarthy v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- People ex rel. Schad, Diamond & Shedden, P.C. v. My Pillow, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- In re Commitment of ChesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.