Legal Opinion
People v. Britton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant contends that his probation was improperly re*933voked because the court did not give him a written copy of the conditions of probation at the time he was sentenced and because he was acquitted of the charges underlying the revocation. It was error for the court to fail to give defendant a written copy of the conditions of his probation so as to inform him explicitly of the conduct to be avoided (see, People v Howland, 108 AD2d 1019). Defendant’s probation was properly revoked, nevertheless, based on his "[c]ommission of an additional offense” (CPL 410.10 [2]) without the need for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. HowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. MorseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. RandolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. KitchensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.